Research library All trust systems compared · Wisconsin agency trusts — trustees & governing documents · The Red River Trust — origin & legal status · Similar trust-template & sovereignty sites · The D'Avila Family Trust myth · Uniform Trust Code & 'common-law' trust compliance · Pure Trust vs Red River/Jimron spendthrift (both common-law trusts) · Titling a Wisconsin vehicle when you have no title · Wyoming/Montana LLCs and who 'beneficial owner' means · Asset-protection & autonomy trust — governing authority (cited cases + UTC) · Trust → holding LLC → operating LLC — the lawful structure · Moving a 15-year-old S corporation into an LLC and into the trust · Wisconsin Voluntary Paternity Acknowledgment — does signing bind you? · Status-paperwork processes compared — State National · SEDM · Amnesty · Does doing one preclude another? — how the status paths interact · State-national source paperwork — file and evidence map

The "D'Avila Family Trust Indenture" — what it actually is

Deep-research synthesis (run wt8nqj5qx, 2026-07-14; 96 agents, 0 errors, all verdicts unanimous 3-0). Requested as a possible trust-drafting template in the Red River / Master's Spendthrift genre. It is not one. The template hypothesis is disconfirmed.

Bottom line

The "D'Avila / Davila / de Avila / Avila Family Trust Indenture" is a fictional, mythical mega-trust invoked in the pseudolegal "global collateral accounts / recovery of global assets" mythology — not a real, fillable trust instrument and not a copyrighted spendthrift-trust product. It has no drafting template, no vendor, no clauses to model, and does not belong in the trust builder. It belongs in the site's research/ideology layer as a cautionary reference.

Crucially, its author is Anna Von Reitz — the same figure behind this project's Wisconsin Assembly source (data/wiassembly-docs.json, the American State Nationals / assembly school). So the D'Avila myth is a branch of an ideology already catalogued here, in its "redemption of global wealth" sub-genre rather than the assembly/land-recording sub-genre.

What the narrative claims (all mythology, quoted for the record)

Published as an "International Public Notice" dated February 22, 2023 by Anna Maria Riezinger ("Anna Von Reitz"), Big Lake, Alaska, styling herself "Fiduciary for The United States of America." Primary source: annavonreitz.com/recoveryavilafamilytrust.pdf, republished on paulstramer.net, roserambles.org, everydayconcerned.net.

None of this describes an operative trust: there are no parties you appoint, no corpus you fund, no spendthrift/discretionary clauses, no Trustee/Protector/ Exchangor offices to fill. It is a conspiracy narrative about global wealth wearing the word "trust indenture," which is exactly the pattern the IRS warns about: "Mere association of the term 'trust' with a financial arrangement does not make it a legitimate trust."

Two real, unrelated same-named trusts (name-match distractors)

Why this matters for the site

  1. Taxonomy: the site now distinguishes three sovereign-trust modes — (a) copyrighted spendthrift-trust templates you actually draft (Red River / Master's — the trust builder), (b) common-law / assembly paperwork (You Are Law, Wisconsin Assembly), and (c) "global collateral accounts" wealth- recovery myth (the D'Avila Trust). Only (a) is buildable; (b) is process/ status paperwork; (c) is pure narrative with nothing to fill out.
  2. It ties back to an existing source. Anna Von Reitz already anchors the Wisconsin Assembly source; the D'Avila notice is cross-linked there.
  3. Guardrail: if a user asks the trust builder to "make a D'Avila trust," the correct response is that there is nothing to build — it is not a real instrument. Recorded so the builder is never pointed at it.

Sources (primary)