Research library All trust systems compared · Wisconsin agency trusts — trustees & governing documents · The Red River Trust — origin & legal status · Similar trust-template & sovereignty sites · The D'Avila Family Trust myth · Uniform Trust Code & 'common-law' trust compliance · Pure Trust vs Red River/Jimron spendthrift (both common-law trusts) · Titling a Wisconsin vehicle when you have no title · Wyoming/Montana LLCs and who 'beneficial owner' means · Asset-protection & autonomy trust — governing authority (cited cases + UTC) · Trust → holding LLC → operating LLC — the lawful structure · Moving a 15-year-old S corporation into an LLC and into the trust · Wisconsin Voluntary Paternity Acknowledgment — does signing bind you? · Status-paperwork processes compared — State National · SEDM · Amnesty · Does doing one preclude another? — how the status paths interact · State-national source paperwork — file and evidence map

Wisconsin agency trusts: instruments, trustees, and proof

Research current through 2026-07-15. This report distinguishes a private trust dealing with an agency, a statutory public fund, and a bond trust created by public resolutions. It also explains what a Wisconsin family or civil action can disclose and what documents prove a trustee's authority.

Bottom line. The DMV's “Registration Fee Trust” is part of Wisconsin's transportation-revenue bond trust. Its current corporate trustee is The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. The Wisconsin Support Collections Trust Fund is a real statutory, nonlapsible trust fund, but its statute does not appoint a named private-style trustee. DCF administers the child-support program, a private contractor operates the payment unit, and SWIB has statutory investment authority. Those are different legal roles.

1. A private trust dealing with WisDOT

WisDOT's “Vehicles involving trusts” procedure concerns a customer's private trust. It does not make WisDOT the trustee.

Who is trustee? The person or entity appointed under the private instrument and identified on MV2790. WisDOT remains the title and registration agency.

Proof: the executed trust agreement and amendments establish the office; the current certification of trust and appointment/resignation chain show who holds it now; the title, deed, or account record proves whether an asset was actually transferred to the trustee.

Sources: WisDOT procedure · MV2790 · WisDOT's current trust-verification guidance · Wis. Stat. §701.1013

2. Registration Fee Trust: the transportation bond trust

The phrase printed on DMV forms is not merely an unexplained remittance label. It is the check-payee name used in a larger public-finance structure: the State of Wisconsin Transportation Facilities and Highway Projects Revenue Obligations Program.

Who is the trustee?

The current financing documents identify The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. as trustee, registrar, and paying agent for the transportation revenue bonds. The 2026 offering materials confirm the same trustee.

WisDOT is the trustee's collection agent. The official reports describe:

  1. mailed checks payable to “Registration Fee Trust” going through a bank lockbox;
  2. DMV service centers collecting program income for the trustee and depositing it into an account in the trustee's name; and
  3. receipts moving into the Redemption Fund, held outside the State Treasury by the trustee and applied under the bond-resolution waterfall.

U.S. Bank's lockbox or payment-agent work does not make U.S. Bank the bond trustee. That service role must not be conflated with BNY Mellon's fiduciary office.

What is the “contract”?

The principal trust-creating contract is not a conventional private trust agreement. It is 1986 State of Wisconsin Building Commission Resolution 9, “State of Wisconsin Transportation Facilities and Highway Projects Revenue Obligations General Resolution,” adopted June 26, 1986, as amended and supplemented by Commission resolutions adopted March 19, 1998, August 9, 2000, and October 15, 2003.

The General Resolution and the applicable series resolutions form the bond contract among the State, trustee, and bondholders. They create funds held by the trustee, pledge registration and related fees as Program Income, establish the payment waterfall, define defaults and remedies, and govern replacement of the trustee. The authority comes from Wis. Stat. ch. 18, subch. II, and §84.59; vehicle-registration fees include those authorized by §341.25.

Located record set and remaining gaps

Record Status What it proves
1986 General Resolution and 1998/2000/2003 amendments Reliably identified and extensively summarized in official statements; a complete standalone execution copy has not yet been located online Creation, pledged property, trust funds, trustee powers, defaults, removal, and succession
Series and award resolutions Published across official statements and Commission records Terms for each bond series and incorporation of the General Resolution
2025 and 2026 official statements Located Current trustee and current operation of the program
Annual continuing-disclosure reports and audits Located Collection flow, balances, deposits, and use of Program Income
WisDOT–trustee collection/agency agreement Expressly referenced in official reports; execution copy not yet located online WisDOT's authority and duties as the trustee's collection agent
Successor-trustee appointment/acceptance record Not yet located online; older reports name Bank One Trust Company, N.A., while current records name BNY Mellon Exact chain of succession into the current trusteeship
Lockbox agreement A statewide U.S. Bank wholesale-lockbox contract is linked by DOA; the program-specific schedule has not yet been isolated Bank's operational role, not the identity of the bond trustee

The most targeted public-records request should ask DOA Capital Finance and WisDOT for electronic copies of the complete General Resolution and all amendments; the current collection/agency agreement; every trustee resignation, removal, appointment, acceptance, merger, or succession record; and the program-specific lockbox agreement or schedule. It should request records, not ask the agencies to answer legal questions.

Sources: 2026 official statement · 2025 official statement · 2021 official statement · 2016 annual report, Part V · 2025 audit · official archive · DOA Treasury contracts · Wis. Stat. ch. 18 · Wis. Stat. §84.59 · Wis. Stat. §341.25

3. Wisconsin Support Collections Trust Fund

What creates it?

Wis. Stat. §25.68 creates a “separate nonlapsible trust fund” consisting of money DCF receives under §49.854; child or family support, maintenance, health, and birth-expense money received under §§767.57 and 767.75; other family-action money received by DCF or its designee; and specified intercepted money.

This statutory trust-fund status and the State's governmental-accounting classification can coexist. The State ACFR reports the operation as a custodial fund because it holds and redistributes money belonging to others; that accounting category does not repeal the legislature's express “trust fund” designation.

Who is the trustee?

Section 25.68 does not appoint an individual or corporate trustee. Wisconsin instead divides the work:

Role Actor Source of authority
Program administrator DCF Bureau of Child Support Child-support statutes and federal Title IV-D plan
Receipt/disbursement operator Conduent, under the current private-vendor arrangement Vendor contract and DCF supervision
Investment manager for fund balances SWIB Wis. Stat. §25.17(1), which includes the Support Collections Trust Fund
Order maker and modifier Wisconsin circuit court Family judgment/order and ch. 767
Case manager/enforcement agency County or tribal child-support agency State–local contracts and statutes

Calling Conduent “the trustee” would overstate the located evidence. Official materials identify it as the State Disbursement Unit operator/contractor. DCF is the supervising agency. SWIB has investment authority. None is expressly named by §25.68 as the common-law trustee of this fund.

Governing and operational documents

The governing stack is:

The actual DCF–Conduent SCTF/SDU execution copy has not yet been located in the public web materials. DOA's separately published Conduent Retail Lockbox Services contract is an enterprise treasury contract and should not be represented as the child-support operating contract without a program-specific schedule or cross-reference. DCF's public contracting contact is the appropriate records custodian for the SCTF contract, procurement record, amendments, statements of work, and current term.

Sources: Wis. Stat. §25.68 · certified current ch. 25 PDF · Wis. Stat. §25.17 · DCF program roles · current state–county contract exhibit · federal State Disbursement Unit law · federal SDU contact directory identifying Conduent staff · DCF contracting information · 2024 State ACFR

4. SWIB: who the trustees are and how they get the office

SWIB is an independent state investment agency created under §15.76 and governed by a nine-member Board of Trustees. It sets investment policy, asset allocation, benchmarks, and risk parameters and appoints the executive director/chief investment officer. Staff execute the program under the Board's oversight.

As of the research date, the official roster is:

Trustee Statutory seat
Clyde Tinnen, chair Public member
Tom Merfeld, vice-chair Public member
Esther Ancel Public member
Kathy Blumenfeld Secretary-designee of the Department of Administration
Barb Bolens Public member
J. Michael Collins Educator and WRS participant
Jeff DeAngelis Public member
Robert Scott Local-government member
John Voelker Non-educator WRS participant

How they become trustees

Their authority comes from public office and statute, not appointment by a private settlor. Section 25.15 imposes the investment purpose and prudent-person, diversification, and sole-interest standards. Section 25.156(5) expressly says the Board members are trustees of the State Investment Fund. SWIB also acts as statutory fiduciary and investment manager for WRS and the other funds listed in §25.17. It is more precise to describe the Board's authority fund by fund than to say every Board member is the separately appointed common-law trustee of every account SWIB invests.

Sources: current Board and biographies · Wis. Stat. §15.76 · Wis. Stat. §15.07 · Wis. Stat. §25.15 · Wis. Stat. §25.156 · Wis. Stat. §25.17 · SWIB public-records description

5. Other Wisconsin public trusts and fiduciaries

The same role-by-role analysis applies to other state systems. A board that administers benefits, a board that invests assets, a program contractor, and a legal trustee are not automatically the same actor.

Fund or system Legal character Fiduciary or administrator Controlling documents
Wisconsin Retirement System Public pension trust with Core and Variable trust funds ETF and its governing boards administer benefits; SWIB invests the assets under statutory fiduciary standards Wis. Stat. chs. 25 and 40, funding policy, and ETF/SWIB governance and investment policies
Common School Fund and related school trust funds Constitutional and statutory public-education trusts Board of Commissioners of Public Lands: the Secretary of State, State Treasurer, and Attorney General serve by constitutional office Wis. Const. art. X §§2 and 7–8, Wis. Stat. ch. 24, and BCPL investment policies
Edvest / Tomorrow's Scholar 529 program Statutory qualified tuition program; reported as a tuition private-purpose trust DFI administers, the College Savings Program Board oversees, and program managers serve under contract Wis. Stat. §§224.50–224.52, DFI-CSP 1, disclosure/enrollment agreement, and management contracts
Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Court-created external trust in which Wisconsin is a beneficiary Wilmington Trust, N.A. is trustee; Wisconsin DOA is the State's lead agency, not trustee Federal consent decrees, State Beneficiary Trust Agreement and modifications, beneficiary certification, mitigation plan, and funding directions
State Investment Fund / Local Government Investment Pool Statutory pooled investment arrangement SWIB Board members are expressly trustees of the State Investment Fund under §25.156(5) Wis. Stat. ch. 25, SWIB policies, ACFR, and participant materials

Sources: WRS funding policy · BCPL governing authorities · DFI 529 statutes and rules · Wisconsin Volkswagen trust documents

6. Would a family or civil action expose the trustee?

Usually, yes if the trust is relevant—but not automatically to the general public, and not necessarily the entire trust instrument. Three questions must stay separate:

  1. Can the case identify the trustee and obtain records?
  2. Is a party's beneficial interest, income, or control relevant to support or property division?
  3. Can the court reach the trust's principal or bind the trustee?

Family action

Wis. Stat. §767.127 requires each party to disclose all assets held separately, jointly, in full, or in part. The list expressly reaches vested and nonvested future interests and any other financial interest or source. The court can require tax returns. The disclosure itself is confidential and restricted to adjudication, appeal, modification, or enforcement of the family action.

In Stevenson v. Stevenson, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that a party violated the disclosure duty by omitting interests in discretionary trusts. The case used document requests, a motion to compel, tax returns, and testimony from the trustee. It also held that trust income taxable to the parent could be used in the child-support calculation even if not distributed.

That means “the trustee decides distributions” is not a reason to omit the trust. It also does not mean a family court automatically owns or can distribute the trust corpus. Trowbridge v. Trowbridge treated a future trust interest as part of the beneficiary's estate but distinguished an order directed to the party from an order purporting to transfer assets held by out-of-state trustees who were not parties.

Ordinary civil action

Wisconsin civil discovery reaches nonprivileged matter relevant to a claim or defense and proportional to the case. A party can use interrogatories, requests for production, depositions, and a subpoena under §805.07 to require a trustee, bank, accountant, agency, or other records custodian to produce documents and testify. The recipient may object, assert privilege, or seek a protective order; relevance and burden still matter.

For the Registration Fee Trust, litigation is unnecessary merely to identify the trustee because official financing records already do that. A public-records request is the proportionate first route to the missing resolution, collection agreement, and succession papers. For WI SCTF, a family case can obtain case-specific payment histories and relevant DCF/vendor testimony, but it is unlikely to uncover a hidden private-style trustee because §25.68 does not name one.

Sources: Wis. Stat. §767.127 · Stevenson v. Stevenson · Trowbridge v. Trowbridge · Wis. Stat. §804.01 · Wis. Stat. §804.09 · Wis. Stat. §805.07

7. Comparison with the reviewed private family trust

The reviewed family-trust file is structurally different from both agency systems. It includes an executed private instrument, a certificate of trust, settlor-resignation material, tax-identification material, banking correspondence, and property-transfer documents. Those are the right categories of evidence, but each proves a different fact.

Fact to prove Strongest proof What is not enough by itself
Trust exists and its terms Complete executed instrument plus every amendment/restatement Name, EIN, Schedule A, or unsigned template
Original appointment Appointment clause and any signed acceptance required by the instrument A person's later assertion that they act as trustee
Current trustee Full resignation/removal/death and successor-appointment/acceptance chain, corroborated by a current certification Original appointment when a later change may have occurred
Trustee's transaction authority Operative clauses plus a current §701.1013 certification Certificate if contradicted by the actual instrument
Asset is trust property Recorded deed, title, assignment, endorsed certificate, or account titled to trustee in fiduciary capacity Merely listing intended property on a schedule without completing transfer
Beneficial interest and control Distribution, revocation, amendment, removal, appointment, and power-of-appointment clauses The labels “irrevocable,” “discretionary,” or “spendthrift” alone
Income and actual administration Account statements, ledger, Form 1041/K-1/1099 records, distributions, minutes, and trustee testimony Draft tax position or an unused bank letter

The local file appears materially stronger on identity evidence than an unexecuted template because it contains both the signed instrument and a certificate naming the acting office. The key litigation questions are still the succession chain, whether each disputed asset was actually funded into the trust, who is settlor and beneficiary, what powers anyone retained, what income was taxable or distributed, and when transfers occurred.

Those facts determine reach. For example, §701.0505 makes property of a revocable trust reachable by a settlor's creditors during life and allows a judgment creditor, in specified circumstances, to reach payments an irrevocable trust permits to or for its settlor. A spendthrift label does not answer those fact-specific questions.

Sources: Wis. Stat. §701.1013 · Wis. Stat. §701.0505

8. Practical proof and request checklist

For a court-ready record, collect documents in this order:

  1. the complete executed instrument or public resolution and all amendments;
  2. every acceptance, resignation, removal, death record, merger record, and successor appointment forming the chain to the current trustee;
  3. a current certification of trust or official statement identifying the current office and powers;
  4. asset-level funding records—deeds, titles, assignments, account-opening records, and statements;
  5. tax and administration records showing who reported income and who received distributions; and
  6. certified public copies or records-custodian testimony/affidavits sufficient to authenticate records if their genuineness is disputed.

A focused records request for the two state systems can use this description:

Please provide existing electronic records consisting of: (1) the complete executed 1986 Transportation Facilities and Highway Projects Revenue Obligations General Resolution and each amendment; (2) the current agreement under which WisDOT collects Program Income as agent of the trustee; (3) all instruments documenting appointment, resignation, merger, replacement, or succession of the current trustee; (4) the current program-specific lockbox agreement or schedule; and (5) DCF's current contract, amendments, statement of work, and procurement award for operation of the Wisconsin Support Collections Trust Fund/State Disbursement Unit. Electronic production is preferred. This request seeks records, not answers to questions.

This report is research, not legal advice. The effect of a private trust in a specific family or civil action depends on the instrument, funding, retained powers, tax reporting, transfers, pleadings, jurisdiction over the trustee, and the relief requested.